NEW STUDY SHOWS INEFFECTIVENESS OF MAMMOGRAMS:
As a physician as well as a woman with fibrocystic bust disease, it actually troubles me when I hear X-Ray Mammography misstated as preventative medicine. X-Rays are never, shape or kind prevention. X-Ray Mammography is at ideal a form of early discovery of bust cancer, but it can only discover a lump after it has actually expanded to a significant size. Even then, X-Ray Mammography misses 50 percent of the growths in women, that have dense busts. Since over 50% of premenopausal women and 25 percent of postmenopausal women have thick breasts, a huge number of women are at risk of misdiagnosis by relying entirely on X-Ray Mammography. This is especially true for ladies with fibrocystic bust condition-- or for ladies with scar tissue in their breasts.I am personallyextremely concerned regarding finding breast condition as a result of my family background-- my sibling passed away of breast cancer when she was 41. That's why I started obtaining Infrared Mammograms several years back. Unlike X-Rays, Infrared Mammography does not call for call with your busts or exposure to dangerous radiation. While X-Ray Mammograms are images of the breast anatomy, Infrared Mammograms are photos of your breast metabolic rate, so that even pre-cancerous inflammation or tiny lumps can be detected, due to the fact that they produce additional heat because of raised blood flow.
Yorumlar
Yorum Gönder